Mobility and Innovation Decision Making

Question: Discuss about the Mobility and Innovation Decision Making. Answer: Introduction: The present open labour market scenarios have provided an opportunity for transforming the innovation in a lot of industries. Innovation has been playing a critical role in the growth of various Organizations which includes various segments like Industries, Technology, Innovation, Production, Information and Technology and Health. Innovation and transformation have to consider the mobility patterns as well which can serve as a complementary to the labour markets. With such incremental changes, the industries would be able to cope well with the newer labour markets and their policies. In this article, the considerations are based on the type of impact which mobility would have on the games industry especially in US and Japan. This type of an inter organizational mobility has seen a positive impact in the US and has been on the negative edge in Japan however inter functional mobility has been on an upper edge in US and Japan. Objective The main objective of the journal Mobility and Innovation A cross country comparison in the video games industry was to conduct an analysis which is based on the career histories in US and Japan. Theoretical Base The research for the analysis has been conducted depending on various cases considered from the online gaming industry in the US and Japan. The research study which has been provided is dependent on the online gaming development of 800 815 and the careers of almost 25000 28000 video game developers. These video game developers had an extensive exposure to the online game development for almost 10 years from 1999 2009. Innovation has contributed to enhance the labour mobility which has helped reduce the unemployment related issues and has also facilitated to the increase of newer industries (Boulhol, 2009; Hall et al., 2006; Nickell and Layard, 1997; Nickell and Layard, 1999; Nicoletti and Scarpetta, 2003). There has been considerable research which was performed on capital markets and science however, not much has been reported to have been studied on labour mobility and innovation Conceptual Underpinnings The present literature which is available on employee mobility and extent of innovation presents various views where some of the Researchers like (Kaiser et al., 2011; Sllner, 2010) have expressed that inter organizational mobility would lay a path for innovation. This point was strongly woven from an aspect where there was clear evidence that inter job mobility has enhanced knowledge transfer process with the social connects people engage in (Talke, Salomo, Wieringa, Lutz, 2009). The study conducted on labour mobility and innovation was based on various organizations where the inter mobility used to happen, various innovation aspects adapted and implemented by different industries, newer industries which have adapted innovation on the front of information and communication. Arguments The literature analysis which was performed was works which were created with the motivation of Researchers from various high technology groups (Schankerman et al., 2006). There were views on based on distinct factors where Researchers have claimed that job changes have enhanced knowledge sharing to a significant extent (Hoisl 2007). This in turn promotes extensive knowledge creation of various repositories to which people would have an access to. There has also been a claim which is on the argumentative side to the previous claim which says that long term employment or an association with a specific organization or a brand is advantageous for innovation and creativity (Acharya et al., 2010; Naastepad and Storm, 2006). The long term association also motivates the companies to invest in organization specific knowledge training to administer better control and reduce management related issues (Zhou et al., 2011; Harcourt and Wood, 2007). Longer periods of association also prove to be advantageous for introducing a knowledge repository of the organizational trainings (Zhou et al., 2011). This point has a stronger point of evidence where it has been noticed that frequent job movements might raise a question on commitment and dedication towards a specific brand or an Organization. Arguments, in alignment with inter organizational mobility has been inspired by high technology Organizations which were largely dependent on enhancing their knowledge and innovative abilities. Methods The study was majorly focussed on microdata samples for the analysis which was performed. The analysis was also focussed on the study related to a website https://www. MobyGames.com. The reason for Moby Games to be chosen was it consisted of various factors of information which was useful for the study. Sources and Credibility of evidence The inter organizational mobility has been an active part of the present career styles of individuals however, knowledge creation and its tampering has been a large of the todays culture with the vast growth and availability of the mobile technology and the high end internet technological sources as saving the data and passing on to the other sources has been an everyday part of life. These evidences have been recorded in the literature done by (Audretsch and Thurik, 2000; Audretschand Fritsch, 2002; Sobel, 2008). On the other hand, Kaiser et al (2011) has confirmed that there were positive effects of job mobility in some Countries like Germany and Denmark. The Countries where weaker performances in terms of the employment standards were recorded were in Japan as there labour regulations were on the stricter side (Bostero et al., 2004). The databases various sources like Moby Games were cross checked with the other online and library sources to maintain the consistency of the qua lity of data. To sum it up, it has been claimed and accepted with significant research that inter organizational change is advantageous for enhancing innovation driven abilities as it motivates them to create and maintain knowledge for the required sources. Place in the literature The research was based on an empirical study conducted by analysing various video games companies and analysing the work related standards and policies in various Companies. The study has made a great contribution to the relation between inter organizational and inter departmental transfers where innovation was the critical factor. Soundness of its conclusions The research was based on a factor which was focussed on whether a high level intercompany transfers would be advantageous for innovation. The relations between transfers and innovation were the key for the discussion. It was proved that the inter organizational transfers weaken the innovation abilities of the Organizations and it was seen especially in cases of Japan, where mobility was on the lower side. Potential theoretical contribution The research has contributed to a long standing aspect of the industry that inter organizational mobility would contribute to enhanced organizational performance as it opens more optimal labour market designs (Hall and Gingerich, 2009; House et al., 2004). Ability to be applied by Managers Inter organizational mobility was found to have to a major implication where it had a higher impact on inter organizational mobility opened new avenues for labour markets and has set newer standards for higher policy making and decision making. Conclusion The key objective of the research was to decide whether inter organizational transfers were advantageous for innovation in the event which the relationships between the transfers and innovation was studied. It was found that the effect was dependent majorly on the context of the Country where we have found that Japan had lower mobility systems. Closed labour markets were much in focus in the article and it would have been greater efforts to give examples of Countries which have enhanced their performance with the advent of inter organizational mobility. References Acharya, V., Baghai, R., Subramanian, K. (2010). Working Paper Labour Laws and Innovation. New York University Stern School of Business. Audretsch, D., Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies 36 (2), 11131124. Audretsch, D., Thurik, A. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st Century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, 1734. Audretsch, D., Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies 36 (2), 11131124. Audretsch, D., Thurik, A. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st Century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10, 1734. Botero, J., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silane, F., Shleifer, A. (2004). The regulation of labour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (4), 13391382. Boulhol, H. (2009). Do capital market and trade liberalization trigger labour market deregulation? Journal of International Economics 77, 223233. Hall, P.A., Gingerich, D.W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional comple-mentarities in the political economy: an empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science 39, 449482. Harcourt, M., Wood, G. (2007). The importance of employment protection for skilldevelopment in coordinated market economies. European Journal of IndustrialRelations 13 (2), 141159. Hoisl, K. (2007). Tracing mobile inventors the causality between inventor mobilityand inventor productivity. Research Policy 36 (5), 619636. House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., Gupta, V. (2004). Leadership, Cul-ture, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications,Thousand Oaks. Naastepad, C., Storm, S. (2006). The innovating firm in a societal context: labour-management relations and labour productivity. In: Verburg, R., Ortt, J., Dicke, W.(Eds.), Managing Technology and Innovation. Routledge, London, pp. 170191. Nickell, S., Layard, R. (1999). Labour market institutions and economic performance. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Labour Economics, 4, pp.30293084. Nickell, S.J., Layard, R. (1997). Unemployment and labour market rigidities: Europe versus North America. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (3),5574. Nicoletti, G., Scarpetta, S. (2003). Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Economic Policy 18, 972. Talke, K., Salomo, S., Wieringa, J.E., Lutz, A. (2009). What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (6), 601615. Zhou, H., Dekker, R., Kleinknecht, A. (2011). Flexible labour and innovation performance: evidence from longitudinal firm-level data. Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (3), 941968.